I’m assuming many of the readers of this blog are Ayn Rand fans, or at least are aware of her work. While the idea has been kicked around for years — and likely decades — a film version of "Atlas Shrugged" is slated to hit theaters on April 15.
While I don’t personally subscribe to her entire philosophy of Objectivism, or her seemingly blanket rejection of any sort of a "collective," I do think her themes and warnings of overarching state abuse and its impact on the business community are noteworthy for our purposes.
The film will be released in three parts. And its fan site busts a few myths about its production, as well. Watch the trailer and let us know if you’re enthused:
Adam Lerrick’s Ayn Rand-ish column in the Wall Street Journal asks a very valid question: How much economic redistribution will the American taxpayer take? From a business perspective, how much can American employers tolerate before the country sees a painful — perhaps even more crippling — backlash? Are we about to find out?
Calculating how far society’s top earners can be pushed before they stop (or cut back on) producing is difficult. But the incentives are easy to see. Voters who benefit from government programs will push for higher tax rates on higher earners — at least until those who power the economy and create jobs and wealth stop working, stop investing, or move out of the country.
Other nations have tried the ideology of fairness in the place of incentives and found that reward without work is a recipe for decline. In the late 1970s and throughout the 1980s, Margaret Thatcher took on the unions and slashed taxes to restore growth and jobs in Great Britain. In Germany a few years ago, Social Democrat Gerhard Schroeder defied his party’s dogma and loosened labor’s grip on the economy to end stagnation. And more recently in France, Nicolas Sarkozy was swept to power on a platform of restoring flexibility to the economy.
The sequence is always the same. High-tax, big-spending policies force the economy to lose momentum. Then growth in government spending outstrips revenues. Fiscal and trade deficits soar. Public debt, excessive taxation and unemployment follow. The central bank tries to solve the problem by printing money. International competitiveness is lost and the currency depreciates. The system stagnates. And then a frightened electorate returns conservatives to power.
The economic tides will not stand still while Washington experiments with European-type social democracy, even though the dollar’s role as the global reserve currency will buy some time. Our trademark competitive advantage will be lost, and once lost, it will be hard to regain. There are too many emerging economies focused on prosperity and not redistribution for the U.S. to easily recapture its role of global economic leader.