Sanford Debacle Provides PR Lessons for CEOs

Well, we’ve complimented South Carolina Governor Mark Sanford’s more sound and judicious moves on this blog in the past. Now, suffice it to say, "sound" and "judicious" might not be applicable for him this week (although we all have our bad weeks).

However, Ragan.com took a look today at how his disappearance — which ultimately led to the disclosure of his affair — could serve as a lesson for CEOs in the business world. Read on:

To paraphrase Simon and Garfunkel: Where have you gone, Mark Sanford?

For the past few days, journalists, politicians, South Carolinians, bloggers, and your wife wondered about your whereabouts. First, we heard you were hiking the Appalachian Trail.

Well, not so much.

It turns out that you were in Argentina visiting a woman with whom you’ve been having an affair. (That’s a whole other domestic communication quandary.)

The issue for corporate communicators is this: Let’s say your CEO leaves unexpectedly—doesn’t even send a postcard. How do you communicate the message to your employees and other stakeholders?

Dustin R. Walling, principal of Dustin Walling Associates, shares these four tips on dealing with a missing or ailing CEO.

Business as near-usual: Every good corporation of size has—or ought to have—a well-conceived set of strategic and tactical plans. This is one of the primary jobs of the CEO and the executive team. If these plans don’t exist, hire a management consultant and get to work.

Appoint the next in command: The COO, CFO, or another key executive is the likely candidate to stand in during the CEO’s absence. The board should meet immediately and appoint one executive, a member of their own ranks, or another trusted leader to the position. Continue reading

Fighting the Lonely Fight: Sanford Joins Daniels in Battle to Cut Spending

As members of a fairly small fraternity — Republican governors — I’m guessing that Indiana’s Mitch Daniels and South Carolina’s Mark Sanford have crossed paths at least a few times. I would also suggest that the two likely see eye-to-eye on a number of topics.

We know what Daniels has accomplished here throughout his first term, and that he has not been afraid to challenge the status quo. Sanford appears to share a passion for reducing government spending, and he too is not afraid to take the unpopular position.

Sanford had an amazing 243 budget vetoes a year ago, nearly all of which were overturned. He vetoed 20 bills this legislative session, with legislators overriding his wishes on 15 of those measures.

Now, while many of his colleagues and state legislators are going to Washington to make their case for part of any new economic stimulus package coming to states, Sanford is on the opposite side of the equation. It’s not that he doesn’t want additional federal investment, but not at the cost of increased funding. To paraphrase, if you’re going to invest, make cuts in the federal budget elsewhere.

Sounds like something Daniels would support.

Read more about Sanford